|
UPDATE 09 February 2006
Non-union
TV station refuses to run ad
01 February 2006
Guild overcomes CanWest newspaper publisher's
refusal to run organizing ad
Victoria Vancouver
Island Newspaper Guild | TNG
Canada Local 30223
A Guild-sponsored quarter-page ad that
appeals to non-unionized media workers on Vancouver Island
appears in today's Victoria Times-Colonist despite
the publisher's initial refusal to run it.
Chris Carolan, president of the Victoria Vancouver Island
Newspaper Guild (VVING), says no reason was given when the
paper first rejected the advertisement — and $3,000
in revenue — last week.
Pressed by the Local executive for an explanation,
publisher Bob McKenzie said he was concerned that the ad
was aimed at, and would offend, advertisers. He eventually
accepted the ad after the Guild agreed to alter the text
but not the message.
"Once you come up with an ad, it should be a walk in
the park," says John Hutchinson, the Local's Grievance
officer who was assigned the task of placing ads in their
employer's paper and on CH TV station, both of which are
owned by CanWest Global. "Because the Times-Colonist and CH are union shops and we were targeting non-union shops,
we figured there'd be no problem. We were wrong."
The Local's executive, which decided
at its January meeting to reach out to employees at non-union
newspapers, TV and radio stations and other media-related
businesses, chose to take a "front-door" approach
to organizing. VVING has had the occasional enquiry from
people who work at CHUM TV or one of the island's 18 community
newspapers owned by Black Press.
The ad — topped with the large, bold headline "Do
You Need a Union?" — contained a number of questions: "Are
you employed at a non-union newspaper, magazine, radio station,
TV station, advertising agency, print shop or creative design
shop? Do you want a fair contract of employment? Does your
boss treat you fairly? Are you treated with dignity and respect?
Is there someone in your workplace to help you if you have
a problem or issue with the boss? Do you have a pension plan?
Dental plan? Health benefits plan? Life insurance?"
Hutchinson, an advertising sales
rep at the newspaper, says McKenzie "thought there
were implications in the ad that these employers were unfair.
"We didn't subscribe to that argument. The (VVING)
executive was PO'd, to say the least, that someone would
try to censor us. Our position was that we were paying for
this ad — it wasn't a freebie — and the paper
wouldn't censor other customers."
The executive considered publicizing the censorship, but
feared that would put the focus on the dispute rather than
on the ad's message.
"We decided to alter the wording to deal with the publisher's
concerns without damaging the integrity of the ad," says
Hutchinson.
What had been questions in the ad
were turned into statements: "We
have negotiated contracts that provide wage rates, working
conditions and a procedure that provides a final resolution
to workplace issues/concerns ... The contracts can cover
such things as Health Benefit Plans, Dental Plan, Life Insurance
and Pension Plan. Issues dealing with fairness in the workplace
... can be addressed."
But, he says, McKenzie still wasn't
satisfied. "The
publisher felt that the perception was that the Times-Colonist was supporting the organizing drive. We solved that by adding
a line at the bottom of the ad that says it's paid for by
the Guild."
The CanWest-owned CH television has accepted the McKenzie-approved
ad and is in talks right now with VVING regarding cost and
scheduling, says Hutchinson.
|