22 SEPTEMBER 2008

Guild members accept 'final offer'
after warning letter from publisher

Ottawa Newspaper Guild | CWA Canada Local 30205

The publisher's warning of dire consequences should Guild members at The Ottawa Citizen reject the company's "best and final" contract offer in a vote held Sunday had the desired effect.

Related Reading
17 September 2008
Guild urges members to reject newspaper's 'final' offer


12 September 2008
Ottawa Local votes 83% in favour of strike mandate


10 September 2008
CanWest newspaper's paltry wage offer spurs Guild to hold strike vote


30 July 2008
Insulting monetary offer sparks move to mediation


23 July 2008
Hard-pressed newspaper employees seek major wage increases


Members of the Ottawa Newspaper Guild (ONG) voted 124 to 39 to accept a five-year collective agreement that provides annual salary increases of 2.5 per cent in the first and last years, and two per cent in the middle three years. With national inflation running at 3.4 per cent, it actually amounts to a wage decrease.

Even though the Guild had made significant gains in areas such as benefits and contract language over five months of difficult negotiations, the bargaining committee had urged members to reject the final offer from the profitable CanWest-owned newspaper.

"I'm disappointed with the outcome because I believe our members were afraid to reject the offer. They thought they would be locked out and they would never work at the Citizen again," says ONG president Lois Kirkup.

“It’s not the wage gains our members deserve, but we respect their choice,” she says.

The more than 200 Guild members, who work in editorial, circulation, building maintenance and financial services, had 10 days earlier voted 83 per cent in favour of giving the bargaining team a strike mandate. The Guild declared at that time that a strike was the last thing it wanted and preferred to continue negotiating until it achieved a fair contract.

The workplace was rife with rumours that the company was preparing to lock out Guild members. Publisher Jim Orban did nothing to dispel that notion.

In a letter addressed to ONG members but circulated to all staff on Friday, Orban said that a labour dispute "could last a long time" because "some 400 of us who do not belong to the Guild will continue to publish and distribute the Citizen, both in print and online, and to serve our readers, our advertisers and our community."

Orban's letter said the Sunday vote "could be one of the most important decisions in the history of this newspaper, with serious consequences for you and everyone else who works at the Citizen. As such, I want you to understand clearly what rejection of the final offer will mean, not only for you, but for all of us.

"For you, a rejection of the final offer will not give your bargaining committee a stronger mandate to take to the bargaining table. Bargaining is over. This is a final offer. If you reject the offer, not only will you have given the Guild a strike mandate, you will have given it the authority to move forward with an actual strike, on 48-hours notice, without further consultation with you."

David Esposti, the CWA Canada staff representative who led the negotiations, says the issues members are now facing have been building over the last decade. That they went through conciliation, mediation and then strongly endorsed a strike mandate is a first for the Local.

"The members were becoming a lot more proactive," which the publisher didn't like, says Esposti. "Basically, he took a group of people who were standing up for themselves and he beat them down."

He adds that it was clear "the mentality (of the members) was they were going to get locked out."

Kirkup, who was buoyed earlier in the month by a membership that was enthusiastic in supporting the bargaining team, says of management: "I think their bullying tactics worked."

Working conditions and morale at the Citizen have deteriorated since the Asper family bought the former Southam newspaper chain from disgraced media baron Conrad Black in 2000.

Buyouts and attrition have reduced newsroom staffing to little more than a skeleton crew which struggles to cope with an ever-increasing workload. A significant salary increase was seen as a form of compensation for long-suffering employees who have had to do more with less for several years now.